Laboratory Analyst Training Curriculum
Module from the Laboratory Analyst Training Curriculum curriculum.
Module 9 — QA/QC Program · Learning Objectives · 1. Build and interpret Shewhart control charts for routine analytical methods. · 2. Participate in interlaboratory round-robin (cross-check) programs. · 3. Apply method precision (r, R) for dispute resolution. · 4. Track instrument calibration, PM, and reagent lot tracking. · 5. Document QA/QC per ISO/IEC 17025 expectations. · Key QA/QC Documents
| Standard | Subject |
|---|---|
| ASTM D6299 | Applying statistical quality assurance to lab test data |
| ASTM D6792 | Quality System for Petroleum Analysis Labs |
| ASTM D7372 | Using Specification Limits and Precision |
| ASTM E691 | Conducting Interlaboratory Study |
| ISO/IEC 17025 | General requirements for testing labs |
| ISO 4259 | Precision of Test Methods — Petroleum |
| Control Chart Elements | |
| Chart | Purpose |
| X-bar / Individuals | Track mean result vs CL, UCL, LCL |
| Moving Range (MR) | Short-term variation |
| Range (R) | Within-run variation on duplicates |
| EWMA | Exponentially-weighted, trend detection |
| Zone / Run rules | Western Electric rules for out-of-control |
| Typical QC Frequency | |
| QC Sample | Frequency |
| Instrument blank | Each run or daily |
| Calibration verification | Start + every 10–20 samples |
| Check standard | Every 10 samples |
| Duplicate | 1 per 20 samples |
| Retained control sample | Daily |
| Reagent blank | Each new reagent lot |
| Method Precision — Reading r & R | |
| Term | Meaning |
| Repeatability (r) | Same operator, same instrument, short interval (95% CL) |
| Reproducibility (R) | Different labs, different operators, different days |
| Site precision (Rsite) | Within-lab, between-operator reproducibility |
| Use of r/R | Accept or reject dispute results within method tolerance |
| Interlab Round-Robin Program | |
| Item | Guidance |
| Frequency | Monthly or quarterly |
| Providers | ASTM D02 CPC, ISOT, proficiency test orgs |
| Z-score target | |Z| ≤ 2 = satisfactory |
| |Z| 2–3 | Questionable — investigate |
| |Z| > 3 | Unsatisfactory — corrective action |
| Nonconformance / CAPA Workflow | |
| Step | Action |
| 1 | Identify OOC trigger (zone rule, failed check, rejected RR) |
| 2 | Contain: hold affected results pending investigation |
| 3 | Root cause: instrument, standard, method, operator |
| 4 | Corrective action: repair/recalibrate/retrain |
| 5 | Preventive action: update SOP, add check step |
| 6 | Document CAPA and verify effectiveness |
| ◄ Return to Instructions |
Source: Laboratory_Analyst_Training_Curriculum_v1.xlsx · Sheet: Mod 9 - QA QC Program
© 2026 Inflection Point Engineering, LLC. All rights reserved. The content of this page — including calculation methods, reference data, written analysis, interactive tools, and source code — is the intellectual property of Inflection Point Engineering, LLC and is protected under applicable copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws. Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution, modification, or derivative use in whole or in part is prohibited without prior written consent.
Disclaimer. This material is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute professional engineering advice. Calculations, reference data, and methodologies are based on published standards and accepted engineering practice but are not a substitute for engineering judgment, site-specific analysis, or review by a licensed Professional Engineer. Inflection Point Engineering, LLC makes no warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose of any content presented here, and shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising from its use. Users assume all risk associated with applying this content to real-world design, operations, or decisions.
© 2026 Inflection Point Engineering, LLC. All rights reserved.